Conectar
Background
Very preterm infants (less than 32 weeks gestational age) experience acute morbidity during their stay in a neonatal intensive care unit. Because of their prematurity and frequent laboratory testing, they experience anemia, requiring correction with packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion(s). PRBC transfusions have been linked to neonatal morbidity, such as necrotizing enterocolitis, but never signs and symptoms of physiological stability.
Objective
The secondary data analysis aimed to examine very preterm infants’ physiological stability before, during, and after PRBC transfusions.
Methods
A within-case, mixed-methods design was used in a secondary data analysis for 16 transfusion cases from 13 very preterm infants.
Results
The findings showed very preterm infants with physiological variables falling within defined limits based on gestational age during the transfusion. Two contrasting case exemplars will be presented.
Discussion
PRBC transfusions are necessary and prevent morbidity in very preterm infants. Observing instability during transfusions and prospectively studying hypothermia, cardiac instability, and thermal gradients is essential to design interventions to decrease morbidity associated with PRBC transfusions.
Supporting care receivers in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), irrespective of diagnosis, setting, or cultural background, lies at the heart of fundamental nursing care. The pursuit of quality ADL care becomes increasingly challenging with the changing complexity of care needs. ADL care delivery is often undervalued and is considered a low-status task despite its crucial importance to care receivers. This study aims to synthesize challenges in ADL care irrespective of the care setting.
In the mixed qualitative methods study, we used expert panel consultations, world café sessions, and a rapid literature review. For data analysis, we simultaneously analyzed the three data sets using inductive and deductive inquiry.
We identified four challenges and their corresponding subthemes. They are (1) Undervalued common-sense work versus complex, high-skilled care provision; (2) Limitations in professional reflective clinical decision-making; (3) Missed opportunities for shared ADL decisions; and (4) Meeting ADL care needs in a high-throughput system.
These challenges reveal the complexity of ADL care and how its paradoxical narrative relates to the conditions in which nursing professionals struggle to create opportunities, for reflective clinical reasoning and shared ADL decisions, by facing organizational and environmental barriers.
This study is relevant to nursing professionals, care organizations, policymakers, and researchers aiming to improve ADL care and provide insights into challenges in ADL care. This study forms the starting point for a changing narrative on ADL nursing care and subsequent quality improvements in the form of, for example, guidelines for nursing professionals.
FreshRSS