Conectar
The multifaceted responsibilities borne by clinical facilitators can impose a significant strain on their mental and emotional health and well-being. Within nursing and other healthcare professions, the responsibilities of clinical facilitators extend beyond conventional clinical duties to encompass supervising, facilitating, assessing, and supporting students as they transition into professional nursing practice. There is a need for insights into the well-being of clinical facilitators in the face of demanding work conditions, limited resources, and the emotional toll of patient care. This article critically reviews the literature to determine the current state of mental well-being among clinical facilitators in undergraduate health professions education and how they should be supported.
A scoping review guided the study using the Population, Context, Concept framework with a search string incorporating associated Boolean operators. 233 records were retrieved from eight databases and reviewed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 13 full-text articles were found to be eligible for extraction and analysis.
Major findings resulted in thematising mental health issue characteristics according to high and low job demands and burnout. Literature outlined the causes of mental health issues, including lack of recognition and appreciation, work performance, teaching and learning practices, student characteristics, support structures, and the environment. Recommendations included training, appropriate support systems, workload, guidelines, monitoring, community of practice, and research-oriented support.
Educational institutions must move beyond ad hoc support and implement integrated, strategic initiatives grounded in the principles of the Job-Demand-Control model. Future research should focus on developing and rigorously evaluating multifaceted intervention programmes that address these systemic factors. By investing in the well-being of clinical facilitators, institutions ultimately invest in the quality of future healthcare providers and the safety of the patients they will serve.
This article sets the tone for factors to consider and provides recommendations for educational institutions to better support the mental well-being of clinical facilitators.
To map and synthesise the main recommendations for arterial blood gas (ABG) collection in intensive care units (ICUs).
A scoping review was conducted according to the PRISMA-ScR Checklist, supported with The PAGER framework and guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology to ensure methodological rigour and analytical comprehensiveness.
Data collection was conducted from February to April 2024. The data sources included: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, PubMed Central, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Web of Science (WoS), SCOPUS, Science Direct, Virtual Health Library (VHL), Excerpta Medica database (Embase), CAPES Thesis and Dissertation Catalogue, Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD), Scientific Open Access Repository of Portugal (RCAAP), Theses Canada and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz) repository.
Key findings recommend the radial artery as the preferred puncture site, an insertion angle of 30° to 45°, the use of 1 or 3 mL syringes and 20G or 23G gauge needles. Transport and storage at room temperature are advised. Cryoanalgesia and subcutaneous analgesia methods were found to be effective for pain management.
The review highlights the best practices for arterial blood gas collection in critical care. The synthesized evidence strengthens clinical practice, informs guidelines for intensive care nursing and promotes safer, higher-quality care for critically ill patients.
The evidence-based recommendations identified can enhance nursing care related to arterial blood gas collection. Adherence to these practices promotes safer, more humanised and evidence-based care during the procedure.
The report of this study followed the PRISMA-ScR Checklist.
There was no patient or public involvement in this scoping review.
To evaluate the impact of a 5-min delay in needle removal after haemodialysis on complications and patient satisfaction in newly created arteriovenous fistulas.
Retrospective cohort study.
This study analysed 109 patients with new arteriovenous fistulas undergoing initial cannulation 8–12 weeks post-surgery. Participants were divided into two cohorts: a conventional group (n = 42) receiving immediate needle removal after pump cessation, and a delayed group (n = 67) retaining needles for 5 min post-pump cessation before removal. Outcomes included haemostasis time, hematoma incidence, 3-month reintervention rates, and patient satisfaction measured by a 5-point scale.
Delaying needle removal by 5 min reduced mean haemostasis time by 32% compared to immediate removal (16.4 min vs. 24.1 min). Hematoma incidence decreased substantially by 76% in the delayed group (3.3% vs. 13.1%). At 3-month follow-up, reintervention rates were 66% lower with delayed removal (9.0% vs. 26.2%). Patients also reported 50% less procedure-related pain and significantly higher satisfaction scores (median 4.5 vs. 2).
A brief 5-min delay in needle removal significantly reduces complications and enhances patient-centered outcomes during early arteriovenous fistula use.
This protocol establishes an evidence-based standard for post-dialysis needle management, directly reducing compression-induced pain and reintervention needs while requiring no additional nursing resources. Implementation can immediately improve vascular access safety in haemodialysis units.
The study addresses high complication rates (26.2%) from immediate needle removal in immature fistulas. Key findings demonstrate 76% fewer hematomas and 66% lower reinterventions with 5-min delayed removal. This evidence may transform global haemodialysis nursing protocols, benefiting a substantial population of patients receiving new fistulas annually.
This study follows the STROBE checklist.
Patients and the public were not involved in the design, conduct, or reporting of this retrospective medical record analysis.
To explore factors affecting research engagement among Nurses, Midwives and Allied Health Professionals (NMAHPs) in England by examining perceptions of research capacity at organisational, team and individual levels.
Research engagement strongly correlates with improved care quality. However, NMAHPs face persistent participation barriers compared to medical colleagues, limiting the development of a multi-professional research workforce.
National descriptive cross-sectional study using a validated survey tool.
Data from NMAHPs across England were collected using the validated Research Capacity and Culture tool. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and inferentially; qualitative free-text responses were evaluated thematically.
Perceived capacity was moderate organisationally and in teams. Organisational strengths included promoting evidence-based practice (68.7%) and leadership support (61.6%). Teams offered moderate research opportunities (58.6%) but limited mentorship (47.9%). Individually, participants showed competence in literature review (69.5%) and data collection (63.4%) but required support for funding acquisition (43.8%) and publication (50.0%). Qualitatively, research was a highly valued aspect of professional identity, though participation is severely constrained by structural conditions, including extreme resource pressures, unclear career pathways, and professional inequality.
Despite strong motivation for evidence-based practice, significant structural barriers restrict NMAHP research engagement. Strengthening capacity demands coordinated action across clinical and policy systems, ensuring equitable access to protected time, mentorship, and vital research infrastructure.
Supporting NMAHPs in research enhances evidence-informed decisions and service innovation. Embedding research into everyday clinical work, rather than viewing it as optional, builds a sustainable multi-professional culture.
This survey pinpoints the specific factors most strongly influencing NMAHP research engagement. It provides healthcare leaders actionable insights to build sustainable research infrastructure and inclusive clinical academic pathways.
This study adhered to STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional research.
No patient or public contribution.
To investigate whether patient safety culture is associated with nurses' turnover intention and to examine correlational sequential pathways involving burnout and job satisfaction, drawing on Conservation of Resources theory.
A descriptive, correlational design.
This study used data collected during 2023 from a hospital-wide patient safety culture survey conducted in four hospitals in South Korea. The sample comprised 3082 nurses from diverse units. Relationships among patient safety culture, burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention were examined using a mediation model within a structural equation modelling framework (WLSMV estimator with probit link), controlling for age and hospital tenure.
Patient safety culture was associated with lower burnout and higher job satisfaction. Burnout was associated with lower job satisfaction and with a higher likelihood of turnover intention, whereas job satisfaction was associated with a lower likelihood of turnover intention. When burnout and job satisfaction were considered together, the association between patient safety culture and turnover intention was explained through these two factors rather than by a direct pathway.
Patient safety culture functions as an organizational resource that relates to reduced burnout and enhanced job satisfaction, which together relate to lower intention to leave.
Strengthening patient safety culture—alongside efforts to reduce strain and foster positive job attitudes—may support nurse well-being and improve retention, thereby supporting continuity and safety of patient care.
This study addresses persistent nurse turnover intention in hospitals and identifies patient safety culture as an organizational lever that operates through reduced burnout and improved job satisfaction. The findings can guide nurse leaders and policymakers in hospitals to implement culture-focused strategies that support staff well-being, enhance retention, and sustain safe patient care.
STROBE guidelines were followed.
No patient or public contribution.
Chagas disease affects millions of individuals across Latin America and imposes a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems, particularly in rural and underserved regions. Chronic Chagasic cardiomyopathy remains one of the leading causes of heart failure-related mortality in endemic countries. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) has emerged as a potential biomarker of myocardial fibrosis in cardiomyopathies. This study was designed to investigate the association between TIMP-1 and myocardial fibrosis in chronic Chagas disease and to assess its potential as an early biomarker of fibrotic remodelling.
Bottom of form: The PTICH trial is a single-centre, prospective observational cohort study conducted at a government reference clinic in Pernambuco, Brazil. The study aims to enrol 210 adults with Chagas heart disease: 140 without ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥52% in women and ≥54% in men) and 70 with ventricular dysfunction (LVEF
The Research Ethics Committee (REC) of Chagas disease and heart failure outpatient clinic—PROCAPE approved the PTICH trial (CAAE number: 65746322.8.1001.5192). Written informed consent has been obtained from all participants enrolled to date, and data handling is in compliance with applicable privacy and data protection regulations. Study findings will be disseminated through targeted outreach to civil society, the scientific community, healthcare professionals and Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) policymakers; school-based science communication activities conducted in collaboration with state education departments (potentially including oral health educational materials); policy briefs and targeted reports for public health managers; technical meetings and institutional presentations; a plain-language summary published on the institutional website; and submissions to peer-reviewed journals and presentations at academic and health policy conferences.
RBR-3dcrj98.
This study aims to explore the history of prior abortions and the factors influencing them among young women seeking abortion services in Foshan, Guangdong, China.
This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study of young women seeking abortion care.
Gynaecological outpatient clinics at the Department of Gynaecology, Foshan Women and Children Hospital Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong, China, between 2013 and 2023.
A total of 7361 young women aged 12–25 years seeking abortion services.
Data on abortion history, sociodemographic factors, contraceptive use and postabortion contraceptive choices were collected and analysed, with special emphasis on the incidence of repeat abortions and the factors associated with them.
Of the 7361 participants, 34.2% reported at least one previous abortion, underscoring a notable public health concern. The mean age of the participants was 22.30 years (SD=2.13). Women with a history of abortion were significantly older than those without (22.57 vs 22.08 years, p
This study underscores the need for targeted interventions to address the multifaceted factors leading to repeat abortions among young women in China. The results offer valuable insights for improving reproductive health outcomes in this vulnerable population and highlight the importance of expanding access to contraceptive education and services in China.
Date K, Baster K, Caunt S, et al. Determining the comparative pharmacodynamic equivalence of a non-invasive diagnostic test for patients with adrenal insufficiency using a randomised 2-way crossover trial: the STARLIT-3 study protocol. BMJ Open 2026;16:e112708. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112708
The article has been corrected following its online publication.
The authors wish to inform readers that co-author Trevor N Johnson (Translational Sciences Group, Certara UK Limited, Sheffield, UK) was inadvertently omitted from the author list. TNJ contributed to data provision, data interpretation and references which were integral to the study methodology in the calculation of the required wash-out period for the IMP and advised on the drafting of this section of the manuscript.
To synthesise the prevalence and patterns of dementia-relevant structural brain MRI abnormalities in adults with suspected or confirmed dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and to summarise MRI protocols and the incremental diagnostic contribution of MRI beyond cognitive screening.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and PsycINFO (January 1990–27 January 2025), plus reference list screening and targeted manual searches.
Observational or diagnostic-accuracy studies from World Bank-defined LMICs including adults (≥50 years) with suspected or confirmed dementia who underwent brain MRI as part of diagnostic evaluation.
Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using ROBINS-I. Random-effects models pooled prevalence of dementia-relevant MRI abnormalities; diagnostic-accuracy outcomes were synthesised narratively due to heterogeneous reference standards and incomplete reporting.
39 LMIC studies were included; 23 studies (2513 participants) contributed to the meta-analysis. Dementia-relevant MRI abnormalities (defined as ≥1 clinically relevant structural abnormality per study definition) were present in 1248/2513 participants. The pooled prevalence of dementia-relevant MRI abnormalities was 58% (95% CI 43% to 72%), with substantial heterogeneity (I²=95%) and a wide prediction interval (8–96%), indicating marked between-study variability; this estimate should be interpreted as a descriptive summary of study-level proportions rather than a precise population parameter.
Brain MRI frequently demonstrates dementia-relevant pathology in LMIC clinical cohorts, usually with mixed neurodegenerative-vascular patterns. Structured visual ratings may add aetiologic specificity beyond cognitive screening, but pooled estimates should be interpreted as summaries of heterogeneous study-level findings rather than precise population parameters, given high heterogeneity and risk of bias.
CRD42024510241.
To investigate the association between quantitative retinal vascular parameters and coronary artery disease (CAD) and to evaluate the efficacy of a retinal phenotype-based diagnostic model as a non-invasive tool for early CAD screening.
A retrospective cross-sectional study.
A single-centre study conducted at the Cardiovascular Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, China, between January and October 2024.
417 patients with suspected angina undergoing their first coronary angiography (CAG) were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years and high-quality fundus photography within 24 hours pre-CAG. Major exclusions were prior coronary interventions, severe systemic/valvular heart diseases and ocular conditions impairing retinal vascular visualisation.
The primary outcome was the association between quantitative retinal vascular parameters and the presence of CAD (defined as ≥50% stenosis). Secondary outcomes included the diagnostic performance area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of three predictive models: one based on quantitative retinal vascular parameters alone, one based on traditional risk factors and a combined model integrating both retinal and clinical variables.
This study enrolled 417 patients undergoing initial CAG. Compared with non-CAD controls (n=190), patients with CAD (n=227) had higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes, along with elevated levels of fasting blood glucose, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), triglyceride (TG) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (all p
Our findings, derived from an artificial intelligence-based fully automated quantitative retinal vascular parameters measurement method, revealed that multiple quantitative fundus parameters—including FD, VD and other morphological parameters were significantly associated with CAD risk. The CAD diagnostic model we developed demonstrates strong performance and high interpretability, making it suitable for early CAD screening and diagnosis.
Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are major drivers of hospitalisation, readmission and mortality. Patient delay, the interval between the onset or recognition of exacerbation symptoms and the first contact with a healthcare professional, represents a potentially modifiable part of the overall prehospital delay. Existing evidence on why people with COPD delay seeking care is fragmented, based on heterogeneous definitions of delay and limited sets of predictors, and has not yet been synthesised within a coherent theoretical framework. This protocol describes a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify determinants of delayed care-seeking during AECOPD, structured by Andersen’s Behavioural Model of Health Service Use.
We will include observational analytic studies (prospective or retrospective cohort, case-control and cross-sectional designs) involving adults (≥18 years) with physician-diagnosed COPD who have experienced at least one AECOPD. The primary outcome is delayed care-seeking, defined as the time interval between onset or recognition of exacerbation symptoms and first contact with a healthcare professional or facility; studies must report a clear definition of "delay" and provide effect estimates (or sufficient data to calculate them) for associations between candidate determinants and delayed presentation or delay duration. Determinants of interest will be mapped onto Andersen’s predisposing, enabling and need-related domains. We will search PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and EMBASE from database inception to the date of the final search, supplemented by grey literature searching, backward reference list screening and forward citation tracking, without restrictions on country or, where feasible, language. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection and data extraction and will assess risk of bias using study design-specific critical appraisal tools appropriate to cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies. Where at least three studies report comparable effect measures for the same determinant–outcome pair, random-effects meta-analyses will be conducted; otherwise, findings will be synthesised narratively. Certainty of evidence for key associations will be graded using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation approach adapted for observational and prognostic evidence.
Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review and meta-analysis, as it will use data extracted exclusively from published studies and other publicly available sources, with no involvement of individual participants or identifiable personal data. The findings of this review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at relevant academic and clinical conferences. The results are expected to inform clinicians, nurses and policymakers about key determinants of delayed care-seeking during AECOPD, and to support the development of theory-informed, targeted interventions aimed at promoting timely healthcare utilisation.
This study has been registered in the PROSPERO (CRD420251244791).
FreshRSS 