Traumatic shoulder dislocation is a common shoulder injury, especially among the young and active population. More than 95% of dislocations are anterior, in which the humeral head is forced beyond the anterior glenoid rim. The injury leads to increased joint laxity and recurrence rates are high. There is evidence that the shoulder biomechanics and neuromuscular control change following dislocation, but the existing literature is scarce, and it remains to be established if and how these parameters are useful in the clinical setting. The aim of this exploratory prospective cohort study is to investigate biomechanical and neuromuscular outcomes in patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair, to test the hypothesis that examinations of these characteristics are applicable in the clinical setting to assess shoulder instability.

This is a prospective multicentre cohort study with repeated measures of 30 patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair. With carefully selected and completely non-invasive examination methods, we will investigate biomechanical and neuromuscular outcomes in the affected shoulders once presurgically and twice post surgically at 6 and 12 months. Patients’ contralateral shoulders are investigated once to establish a preinjury level.

The study was approved by the Capital Region Ethics Committee (journal-no: H-21027799) and the Capital Region Knowledge Center for Data Reviews (journal-no: P-2021-842) before patient recruitment began. The study results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals, online and in other relevant media, presented at medical conventions and disseminated to clinicians and patients as appropriate.

NCT05250388.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, which is partly contributed to the increasing prevalence of COPD owning to a demographic shift towards an older population. Conversely, recent studies on COPD mortality that take this demographic shift in age into account find decreasing overall age-standardised COPD mortality rates over time. This decrease in the age-standardised COPD mortality rate is contributed advances in COPD diagnostics and treatment, decreasing smoking prevalence and general advances in medical care particularly in western countries. However, it is unknown if patients with COPD have experienced a comparable relative increase in survival in line with the general population.

Hence, there is a need for longitudinal studies comparing trends in mortality in patients with COPD compared with matched non-COPD individuals from the background population.

This is a cohort study with a matched non-COPD comparator cohort. Data are retrieved from the Danish national registers. Data from multiple registries from 1983 to 2018 will be merged on an individual level using the 10-digit Civil Registration numbers that are unique to each citizen in Denmark. Time trends in mortality in patients with COPD compared with the matched comparator cohort will be examined in three study periods: 1983–1993, 1994–2007 and 2008–2018.

The study is entirely based on registry data and ethical approval is not required according to Danish Law and National Ethics Committee Guidelines. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and reported at appropriate national and international conferences.

Rises in average life expectancy, increased comorbidities and frailty among older patients lead to higher admission rates to intensive care units (ICU). During an ICU stay, loss of physical and cognitive functions may occur, causing prolonged rehabilitation. Some functions may be lost permanently, affecting quality of life (QoL). There is a lack of understanding regarding how many variables are relevant to health-related outcomes and which outcomes are significant for the QoL of frail, elderly patients following discharge from the ICU. Therefore, this scoping review aims to identify reported variables for health-related outcomes and explore perspectives regarding QoL for this patient group.

The Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews will be employed and original, peer-reviewed studies in English and Scandinavian languages published from 2013 to 2023 will be included. The search will be conducted from July 2023 to December 2023, according to the inclusion criteria in Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and CINAHL. References to identified studies will be hand-searched, along with backward and forward citation searching for systematic reviews. A librarian will support and qualify the search strategy. Two reviewers will independently screen eligible studies and perform data extraction according to predefined headings. In the event of disagreements, a third reviewer will adjudicate until consensus is achieved. Results will be presented narratively and in table form and discussed in relation to relevant literature.

Ethical approval is unnecessary, as the review synthesises existing research. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication in a scientific journal.